michael-wayne-montgomery-aka-shaka-zulu-x-aka-thomas-edward-howard-v , 86 F.3d 1151 ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • 86 F.3d 1151

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
    Michael Wayne MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Zulu X, a/k/a Thomas
    Edward Howard, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Laura BESSINGER, Warden/Head Administrator, Kirkland
    Correctional Institute; Captain Jackson, Captain over other
    Security Staff at Kirkland Correctional Institute; Nurse
    Stanley, Nurse, Maximum Security Unit, Kirkland Correctional
    Institute; Lieutenant Davis, Second Shift Supervisor at
    Maximum Security Unit of Kirkland Correctional Institute;
    Doctor Neal, Physician, Kirkland Correctional Institute;
    Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of
    Corrections; B. Lymore, Sergeant, Kirkland Correctional
    Institute; B. Rutherford, Correctional Officer, Kirkland
    Correctional Institute, Maximum Security Unit; Dwayne
    Walker, Correctional Officer, Kirkland Correctional
    Institute, Maximum Security Unit; Vaughn Jackson, Captain;
    Lieutenant Martin, Defendants-Appellees.

    No. 95-8558.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

    Submitted: May 16, 1996.
    Decided: May 31, 1996.

    D.S.C.

    AFFIRMED.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-896-6-3AK, CA-93-909-6-3AK, CA-93-2158-6-3AK, CA-93-2159-6-3AK, CA-94-247-6-3AK)

    Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, Elizabeth Krawcheck Rodgers, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:

    1

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Montgomery v. Bessinger, Nos. CA-93-896-6-3AK; CA-93-909-6-3AK; CA-93-2158-6-3AK; CA-2159-6-3AK; CA-94-247-6-3AK (D.S.C. Dec. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-8558

Citation Numbers: 86 F.3d 1151

Filed Date: 5/31/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016