Mark Adams Waterloo Medical Labs, LLC Ashton Kouzbari and Strategic Medical Services, LLC v. Landon Northcutt Diversified Sales, LLC Star Hospital Solutions, LLC and Go Net, LLC ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Order filed September 15, 2017
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-17-00252-CV
    __________
    MARK ADAMS; WATERLOO MEDICAL LABS, LLC; ASHTON
    KOUZBARI; AND STRATEGIC MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC,
    Appellants
    V.
    LANDON NORTHCUTT; DIVERSIFIED SALES, LLC; STAR
    HOSPITAL SOLUTIONS, LLC; AND GO NET, LLC, Appellees
    On Appeal from the 266th District Court
    Erath County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CV34582
    ORDER
    In this accelerated appeal from two orders in which the trial court granted a
    temporary injunction without notice to Appellants, Appellants have filed in this court
    an emergency motion. In their motion, Appellants ask that we dissolve or stay the
    two orders issued by the trial court and also that we stay all proceedings below. We
    grant the motion in part.
    We note that the trial court’s orders are not merely temporary restraining
    orders, but are temporary injunctions. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 680, 681. “No temporary
    injunction shall be issued without notice to the adverse party.” TEX. R. CIV. P. 681.
    We also note that a hearing is scheduled to be held in the trial court on September 18,
    2017, and that two of the trial court’s stated purposes for the hearing are (1) to
    determine whether a temporary injunction should be granted and (2) to rule on
    Appellants’ motion to reconsider and to dissolve the temporary injunction. We
    express no opinion regarding the merits of Appellees’ request for a temporary
    injunction; however, we note that Rule 29.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure provides that we may, in this accelerated appeal, review any “further
    appealable interlocutory order concerning the same subject matter.”
    We grant Appellants’ emergency motion with respect to Appellants’ request
    to stay the injunctive orders issued by the trial court on August 25, 2017, and
    September 8, 2017. The emergency motion is denied with respect to Appellants’
    request to stay all proceedings in the trial court. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
    ANN. § 51.014(a)(4), (b) (West Supp. 2016); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 29.1.
    PER CURIAM
    September 15, 2017
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-17-00252-CV

Filed Date: 9/15/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/22/2017