-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOHN STAPAS, : No. 123 WAL 2017 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : GIANT EAGLE, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA : ENTITY; GIANT EAGLE, INC., T/D/B/A : GETGO FROM GIANT EAGLE,A : PENNSYLVANIA ENTITY; GIANT EAGLE : INC., T/D/B/A SOUTHSIDE GETGO, A : PENNSYLVANIA ENTITY; NADEEN : MCSHANE, AN INDIVIDUAL; GETGO : PARTNERS SOUTH, A PENNSYLVANIA : ENTITY; GETGO PARTNERS SOUTH- : MARYLAND, LLC, A PENNSYLVANIA : ENTITY; AND GETGO HOLDINGS, LLP, : A PENNSYLVANIA ENTITY, : : Respondents : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are: a. Does the Superior Court’s decision to reverse the trial court’s finding of waiver, despite Giant Eagle’s failure to object to flawed jury instructions, flawed verdict slip and/or the problematic verdict, all of which contributed to the error complained of on appeal, conflict with this Court’s holding in Straub v. Cherne Indus.,
583 Pa. 608,
880 A.2d 561(2005), a case not considered by the Superior Court? b. Does the Superior Court’s decision to excuse Giant Eagle’s failures to object to flawed jury instructions, flawed verdict slip and/or a problematic verdict, merely because the appeal is styled as a “challenge to the weight of the evidence,” conflict with the timely objection requirement of Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.,
457 Pa. 255,
322 A.2d 114(1974)? [123 WAL 2017] - 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 123 WAL 2017 (Granted)
Citation Numbers: 171 A.3d 1283
Filed Date: 9/26/2017
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023