In Re: Amendments to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules , 252 So. 3d 733 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •           Supreme Court of Florida
    ____________
    No. SC17-1362
    ____________
    IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL
    QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION RULES
    August 30, 2018
    PER CURIAM.
    The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (Commission or JQC) has
    submitted for this Court’s review recent amendments to the Florida Judicial
    Qualifications Commission Rules (JQC Rules). Article V, section 12(a)(4) of the
    Florida Constitution authorizes this Court, with five justices concurring, to repeal
    the Commission’s rules of procedure or any part thereof. The Court now exercises
    that authority and repeals the recent amendments to JQC Rules 6 and 20 that
    purport to authorize the Commission’s investigative and hearing panels to
    designate filings with this Court confidential (confidentiality amendments). These
    amendments are inconsistent with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420
    (Public Access to and Protection of Judicial Branch Records) and beyond the
    Commission’s authority under the Florida Constitution.
    In its July 24, 2017, notice of adoption, the Commission submitted for this
    Court’s review a number of recent amendments to the JQC Rules, including the
    confidentiality amendments to rules 6 and 20.1 This Court reviewed all the
    amendments and ordered the Commission to explain why the confidentiality
    amendments should not be repealed for inconsistency with rule 2.420. After
    receiving the Commission’s response, this Court issued an order requesting
    clarification of the amendments. The Commission responded to this order and
    simultaneously provided a notice of adoption of revised confidentiality
    amendments to rules 6 and 20. Having considered the originally submitted
    amendments, the Commission’s responses to this Court’s orders, and the notice of
    adoption of revised amendments to rules 6 and 20, the Court repeals only the rule 6
    and 20 confidentiality amendments.
    Similar to the confidentiality amendments originally submitted in this case,2
    the revised confidentiality amendments, which resulted in newly adopted JQC
    1. The amendments originally submitted are the amendments included in
    the October 27, 2017, second revised appendix A to the July 24, 2017, notice of
    adoption. The Court published those amendments for comment. No comments
    were filed.
    2. The original confidentiality amendments consisted of amendments to
    relettered rule 6(k) and a new rule 20(b) that authorized the investigative and
    hearings panels to designate portions of filings with this Court confidential. The
    Commission added the following sentence to relettered rule 6(k):
    -2-
    Rules 6(l) and 20(b), authorize the Commission’s investigative and hearing panels
    to designate filings with this Court, or portions of those filings, confidential.3
    The Investigative Panel may designate portions of the filing with the
    Supreme Court confidential. Portions of the filings designated as
    confidential shall be described without revealing the confidential
    information and will remain so, subject to further order from the
    Supreme Court.
    Appendix A Second Revised at 5, In re Amends. to Fla. Jud. Qualif. Comm’n
    Rules, No. SC17-1362 (Fla. appendix filed Oct. 27, 2017). The Commission added
    new rule 20(b) to provide as follows:
    The Hearing Panel may designate portions of the record, findings, and
    recommendation confidential. Portions of the record designated as
    confidential shall be described without revealing the confidential
    information and will remain so, subject to further order from the
    Supreme Court.
    
    Id. at 7.
    3. Newly adopted rules 6(l) and 20(b), included in the Commission’s
    March 13, 2018, response and notice of adoption, provide that the
    investigative and hearing panels
    may designate filings with the Supreme Court, or portions of
    documents therein, as confidential. The confidential information shall
    be described without revealing the confidential information, consistent
    with the procedure contained in Rule 2.420 of the Florida Rules of
    Judicial Administration. The materials that may be designated as
    confidential include those items listed in Rule 2.420, or other medical
    and psychological records, or filings referencing those materials. The
    materials designated as confidential by the Commission shall remain
    so, subject to review by, and further order of the Supreme Court.
    Response to Request for Clarification; and Notice of Adoption of Amends. to
    Rules 6 and 20(b) of the Fla. Jud. Qualif. Comm’n at 2-3, In re Amends. to Fla.
    Jud. Qualif. Comm’n Rules, No. SC17-1362 (Fla. document filed Mar. 13, 2018).
    -3-
    According to the Commission, authorizing its panels to designate filings with this
    Court confidential is the Commission’s “attempt to avoid disclosure of medical and
    personal information that is necessary to provide to [this] Court in cases involving
    disability or illness.”4 This Court does not question that the Commission’s attempt
    to protect such sensitive medical and personal information from public view is
    made with good intentions. However, this Court must repeal the confidentiality
    amendments because neither the Commission nor its panels have authority to
    designate filings in this Court confidential under rule 2.420 or the Florida
    Constitution, and the Commission does not have authority to adopt a rule of
    procedure purporting to grant such authority.
    Under article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution, this Court has
    exclusive authority to “adopt rules for the practice and procedure in all courts,”
    including this Court. Article V, section 12(a)(4) of the Florida Constitution
    authorizes the Commission to “adopt rules regulating its proceedings.” However,
    neither that provision of the constitution5 nor article I, section 24, which creates the
    4. Notice of Adoption of Amendments to the Rules of the Fla. Jud. Qualif.
    Comm’n at 6, 10, In re Amends. to Fla. Jud. Qualif. Com’n. Rules, No. SC17-1362
    (Fla. notice filed July 24, 2017); Response to Request for Clarification; and Notice
    of Adoption of Amends. to Rules 6 and 20(b) of the Fla. Jud. Qualif. Comm’n at 2-
    3, In re Amends. to Fla. Jud. Qualif. Comm’n Rules, No. SC17-1362 (Fla.
    document filed Mar. 13, 2018).
    5. Cf. In re Rules of Fla. Jud. Qualif. Comm’n, 
    364 So. 2d 471
    , 471 (Fla.
    1978) (repealing JQC rule purporting to establish procedures governing JQC
    -4-
    public’s right of access to judicial branch records and the limitations on that right,6
    authorizes the Commission to adopt rules allowing its panels to designate filings in
    this Court confidential.
    Article I, section 24 of the Florida Constitution recognizes the rules of this
    Court that were in effect at the time of the adoption of that section as one source of
    limitation on the public’s right of access to judicial branch records.7 Therefore, in
    October 1992, in anticipation of the adoption of article I, section 24, this Court
    adopted Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 to govern access to judicial
    branch records.8
    As relevant here, rule 2.420 provides the procedures for determining the
    confidentiality of court records, which includes all filings with this or any other
    proceedings in this Court as exceeding Commission’s constitutional authority to
    “adopt rules regulating its proceedings” and intruding on this Court’s exclusive
    authority to “adopt rules for the practice and procedure in all courts”).
    6. Article I, section 24 of the Florida Constitution creates a right of access to
    all public records as defined by that section, which includes judicial branch
    records, except for those records made confidential by another section of the
    constitution, by a statute enacted by the Legislature, or by a court rule that was in
    effect when article I, section 24 was adopted.
    7. Art. I, § 24(d), Fla. Const.
    8. See In re Amends. to Fla. Rule of Jud. Admin.—Public Access to Jud.
    Records, 
    608 So. 2d 472
    (Fla. 1992) (adopting Florida Rule of Judicial
    Administration 2.051, which has been renumbered 2.420, to govern public access
    to judicial branch records).
    -5-
    state court.9 Thus, the only filings in a JQC proceeding in this Court that can be
    designated and maintained as confidential are those determined to be confidential
    in accordance with the rule 2.420 procedures adopted by this Court.10 A filing in
    this or any other state court is not confidential under rule 2.420 and cannot be
    otherwise “designated” confidential simply because it contains sensitive personal
    information.11 And nothing in rule 2.420 excludes from its requirements filings in
    JQC proceedings in this Court or authorizes the Commission or its panels to
    designate such filings confidential and exempt from the public’s constitutional
    right of access to those records.
    9. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(b)(1) (defining “[r]ecords of the judicial
    branch”); 2.420(b)(1)(A) (defining “court records”).
    10. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(d)(1)-(d)(3) (listing information in court
    records that the clerk of court must designate and maintain confidential; providing
    for the filing of a notice of confidential information in court filings; and providing
    for the filing of motions to determine confidentiality of information in court
    records that may be confidential under subdivision (c) of rule 2.420 but is not listed
    under subdivision (d)(1)); Fla R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(g)(1), (g)(8) (providing for the
    filing of motions to determine confidentiality of appellate court records and
    providing that records of a lower tribunal determined to be confidential by that
    tribunal must be treated as confidential during any review proceedings).
    11. Cf. In re Implementation of Comm. on Privacy & Court Records
    Recommendations, 
    78 So. 3d 1045
    , 1049-50 (Fla. 2011) (explaining that Florida
    Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425 provides the procedures for minimizing the
    amount of sensitive personal information included in documents being filed with
    the court and that rule 2.420 provides the procedures for determining the
    confidentiality of information after it has been filed).
    -6-
    Consistent with article V, section 12(a)(4) of the Florida Constitution, which
    makes proceedings against a judge before an investigative panel of the
    Commission confidential, rule 2.420(c)(3)(A) recognizes as confidential
    complaints alleging misconduct against judges until probable cause is found.
    However, after an investigative panel finds probable cause and files formal charges
    with the Clerk of this Court, any further proceedings before the Commission or this
    Court are public, and the records created in connection with or filed in those
    proceedings are public unless they are recognized as confidential under rule
    2.420(c).
    This Court cannot agree with the Commission that rule 2.420(c)(8)
    authorizes the Commission to adopt the confidentiality amendments at issue here.
    Rule 2.420(c)(8) recognizes as confidential “[a]ll records presently deemed to be
    confidential by . . . the rules of the Judicial Qualifications Commission.” This
    provision was adopted in 1992, shortly before article I, section 24 of the Florida
    Constitution.12 Section 24(d) preserves the effectiveness of rules of court
    exempting certain judicial branch records from public access as of the date this
    section was adopted, but it does not authorize new rules of court providing
    additional exemptions. On the contrary, section 24(c) grants only the Legislature
    12. In re Amends. to Fla. Rule of Jud. Admin.—Public Access to Jud.
    
    Records, 608 So. 2d at 474
    .
    -7-
    the power to create new exemptions. Consistent with these constitutional
    provisions, rule 2.420(c)(8) simply recognizes as confidential records that were
    confidential under any JQC rule that existed at the time rule 2.420 was adopted.13
    That rule does not authorize the Commission to adopt new rules of procedure
    addressing the confidentiality of its filings in this Court.
    Accordingly, this Court repeals the amendments to JQC Rules 6 and 2014
    that purport to authorize the Commission’s panels to designate filings with this
    Court confidential.
    It is so ordered.
    CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and
    LAWSON, JJ., concur.
    LEWIS, J., concurs in result.
    THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE
    EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.
    13. The term “presently” as used in rule 2.420(c)(8) means at the time of the
    1992 adoption of the rule. See 
    id. at 472-73
    (recognizing that proposed
    amendment to the Florida Constitution, which became article I, section 24,
    provided that all judicial branch records are public except those exempted by rule
    in effect on the date of the adoption of the amendment or those exempted by the
    Legislature and therefore constitutional amendment would prohibit the later
    adoption of judicial branch rules that would close any other judicial branch
    records).
    14. To avoid any revival issues, the Court repeals new rules 6(l) and 20(b)
    included in the appendix to this opinion and the amendment to relettered rule 6(k)
    and new rule 20(b) quoted in footnote 2 of this opinion.
    -8-
    Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Judicial Qualifications Commission
    Krista Marx, Chair, West Palm Beach, Florida, Michael L. Schneider, Executive
    Director, and Alexander J. Williams, Assistant General Counsel, Judicial
    Qualifications Commission, Tallahassee, Florida,
    for Petitioner
    -9-
    APPENDIX
    APPENDIX A THIRD REVISED (with Changes to 6(l) and 20(b))
    FILED MARCH 14, 2018
    RULE 2.      DEFINITIONS
    In these rules, the singular shall include the plural and vice-versa, and any
    singular personal pronoun shall include both feminine and masculine genders, and
    unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:
    (1)    “Commission” means the Judicial Qualifications Commission.
    (2) “Investigative Panel” means a division of the Commission vested with
    the jurisdiction to receive or initiate complaints, conduct investigations, dismiss
    complaints, and, upon a vote of a simple majority of the panel, submit formal
    charges to the hearing panel. The chair of the Commission shall be its chair.
    (3) “Hearing Panel” means a division of the Commission vested with the
    authority to receive and hear formal charges from the Investigative Panel. The
    Hearing Panel, by majority vote of its members may recommend to the Supreme
    Court that a judge be subject to appropriate discipline. Upon a two-thirds vote, the
    panel may recommend to the Supreme Court the removal of a judge, as provided in
    Article 5, § 12, of the Constitution of the State of Florida, or the involuntary
    retirement of a judge for any permanent disability that seriously interferes with the
    performance of judicial duties.
    (4) “Judge” means a justice of the Supreme Court and a judge of the
    District Court of Appeal, Circuit Court and County Court.
    (5)    “Chair” includes the acting chair.
    (6) “General Counsel” means any member of The Florida Bar
    designatedemployed by the Commission to serve as legal advisor to the
    Commission and Investigative Panel, and to perform such other duties as
    authorized by the Commission to gather and present evidence before the
    Investigative Panel or the Hearing Panel with respect to the charges against a judge
    and to represent the Commission in any proceedings, related to the activities of the
    Commission.
    - 10 -
    (7) “Counsel to the Hearing Panel” means any member(s) of The Florida
    Bar, designated by the Hearing PanelChair of the Commission to serve as legal
    advisor to the Hearing Panel. Counsel to the Hearing Panel shall act as clerk to the
    Hearing Panel during the trial, collect evidence, and transmit the record to the
    Supreme Court.
    (8) “Special Counsel” means any member(s) of The Florida Bar
    designated by the Investigative Panel to gather and present evidence before the
    Investigative Panel or the Hearing Panel with respect to the charges against a judge
    and to represent the Commission in any proceedings, related to the activities of the
    Commission.
    (9)    “Shall” is mandatory and “may” is permissive.
    (10) “Mail” and “mailed” include ordinary, registered, certified, or other
    form of United States mail, personal delivery, and delivery by a commercial
    delivery service.
    (11) “Executive Director” means a person designatedmember of The
    Florida Bar employed by the Commission to supervise its staff, to serve as legal
    advisor to the Commission and Investigative Panel, and to render such services to
    the Commission and its several panels as required, provided, however, that. theThe
    Executive Director and administrative staff will provide only ministerial or similar
    services to facilitate the activities of the Hearing Panel.
    (12) “Member” means a member of the Commission.
    (13) “Supreme Court” means the Supreme Court of Florida.
    RULE 4.      OFFICERS OF THE COMMISSION
    The Commission shall elect a Chair and a Vice-Chair, each of whom shall
    serve for a term of two years. The Vice-Chair shall act as the chair of the
    Commission in the absence of the Chair. If both the Chair and the Vice-Chair are
    absent, then a majority of the members present may appoint a Chair Pro Tempore.
    The Commission may employ staff, including an eExecutive dDirector and
    General Counsel, and such other staff as necessary to carry out its duties. The
    Commission will consider and decide matters relating to budget and other business
    of the Commission not specifically assigned to its panels. The Hearing Panel
    mayChair shall appoint Counsel to the Hearing Panel to serve as its legal advisor.
    - 11 -
    RULE 6.      INVESTIGATIVE PANEL RULES
    (a) The Investigative Panel of the Commission, upon receiving factual
    information, not obviously unfounded or frivolous, or an individual complaint
    made under oath, indicating that a judge is guilty of willful or persistent failure to
    perform judicial duties, or conduct unbecoming a member of the judiciary
    demonstrating a present unfitness to hold office, or conduct violative of the Code
    of Judicial Conduct, or that the judge has a disability seriously interfering with the
    performance of the judge’s duties, which is, or is likely to become, permanent in
    nature, may make an investigation to determine whether formal charges should be
    instituted.
    (b) The judge has no right to be present or to be heard during an
    investigation, but before the Investigative Panel determines that there is probable
    cause to initiate formal charges, the judge shall be notified of the investigation, the
    general nature of the subject matter of the investigation, and shall be afforded
    reasonable opportunity to make a statement before the Investigative Panel,
    personally or by the judge’s attorney(s), verbally or in writing, sworn or unsworn,
    explaining, refuting or admitting the alleged misconduct or disability, and to
    respond to questions from the Panel. The judge shall not have the right to present
    other oral testimony or evidence, nor the right of confrontation or cross-
    examination of any person interviewed, called or interrogated by the Investigative
    Panel; provided that the Investigative Panel in its sole discretion may receive and
    consider documentary evidence, including affidavits submitted by a judge. Such
    notification shall be given personally, by registered or certified mail, or by delivery
    by a commercial service, addressed to the judge at the judge’s chambers or, if
    returned undelivered, at the judge’s last known residence.
    (c) The Investigative Panel shall have the right to require a judge to meet
    with it on an informal basis in reference to matters that relate to the judge’s duties.
    (d) When a judge has received a notice of investigation, or a notice to
    appear before the Investigative Panel, or has requested such notification, the judge
    shall be promptly notified in writing if the investigation does not disclose probable
    cause to warrant further proceedings.
    (e) The Investigative Panel shall have access to all information from all
    executive, legislative and judicial agencies, including grand juries. At any time, on
    request of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Commission shall
    - 12 -
    make available all information in possession of the Commission for use in
    consideration of impeachment.
    (f)    When the Investigative Panel finds probable cause that formal charges
    should be filed against the judge, the Investigative Panel shall file a Notice of
    Formal Charges with the Clerk of the Supreme Court. The Investigative Panel shall
    designate one or more Special Counsel who shall prepare appropriate papers and
    pleadings, gather and present evidence before the Hearing Panel with respect to the
    charges against the judge, and otherwise act as counsel in connection with the
    prosecution of the charges against the judge, including the representation of the
    Commission in connection with any Commission or judicial proceedings. The
    Investigative Panel shall cause to be served on the judge a copy of the Notice of
    Formal Charges. Such proceedings shall be styled:
    “BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
    COMMISSION”
    “Inquiry Concerning a Judge, The Honorable____________, No. ______”
    (g) The notice shall be issued in the name of the Commission and specify
    in ordinary and concise language the charges against the judge and allege the
    essential facts upon which such charges are based, and shall advise the judge of the
    judge’s right to file a written answer to the charges against within 20 days after
    service of the notice upon the judge.
    (h) Service of the notice shall be made personally, by registered or
    certified mail or by commercial delivery service, addressed to the judge at the
    judge’s chambers or, if returned undelivered, at the judge’s last known residence.
    (i)    After the notice has been filed, any notice or other material shall be
    mailed to the judge at the judge’s chambers or residence address, or to the judge’s
    attorney(s), if any.
    (j)   The notice may also include the judge’s prior relevant judicial
    disciplinary history with the Commission and the record will be made available to
    the Hearing Panel to establish a pattern of conduct or to assist the Hearing Panel in
    recommending the appropriate sanction to the Supreme Court.
    (k) The Investigative Panel may reach agreement with a judge on
    discipline or disability, and such stipulation shall be transmitted directly to the
    - 13 -
    Supreme Court to accept or reject. If rejected, such agreement shall be without
    prejudice to any party thereto.
    (l)     The Investigative Panel may designate filings with the Supreme
    Court, or portions of documents therein, as confidential. The confidential
    information shall be described without revealing the confidential information,
    consistent with the procedure contained in Rule 2.420 of the Florida Rules of
    Judicial Administration. The materials that may be designated as confidential
    include those items listed in Rule 2.420, or other medical and psychological
    records, or filings referencing those materials. The materials designated as
    confidential by the Commission shall remain so, subject to review by, and further
    order of the Supreme Court. (REPEALED)
    RULE 8.      SUSPENSION OF JUDGE
    Before or after the filing of a Notice of Formal Charges, the Investigative
    Panel may, in its discretion, issue its order directed to the judge ordering the judge
    to show cause before it why that panel should not recommend to the Supreme
    Court that the judge be suspended from office, either with compensation or without
    compensation, while the inquiry is pending. The order to show cause shall be
    returnable before the Investigative Panel at a designated place and at a time certain,
    at which place and time the Investigative Panel shall consider the question of
    suspension and any action thereto. Factors to be considered include: the
    seriousness of the allegation of misconduct, the preservation of public confidence
    in the judicial system, the responsiveness of the judge to the disciplinary process,
    or whether the judge has engaged in conduct that demonstrates a present unfitness
    to hold office. The arrest or conviction of a crime constitutes a sufficient basis for
    the recommendation for suspension under this rule. Thereafter, and upon the filing
    of a Notice of Formal Charges with the Supreme Court, the Investigative Panel, not
    less than two-thirds of its members concurring, may recommend to the Supreme
    Court that the judge be suspended from performing the duties of office, either with
    or without compensation, pending final determination of the inquiry. If the
    Investigative Panel recommends suspension, such recommendation shall have
    incorporated therein a record of the proceedings of the Investigative Panel in
    relation to the order to show causethe factual basis for the recommendation.
    RULE 11. SETTING FOR HEARING
    After the filing of an Answer or the expiration of the time for its filing, the
    Hearing Panel shall set a time and place for a hearing and shall give notice of such
    - 14 -
    hearing at least 20 days prior to the date set. If the judge timely requests that the
    hearing be held in the county of the judge’s residence, it shall be so held unless the
    Hearing Panel, by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of its members, determines
    otherwise. Hearings before the Commission should be accorded precedence over
    most other proceedings due to the extraordinary nature of the hearing.
    RULE 12. PROCEDURE
    (a) Settlement Negotiations. Prior to commencement of the hearing to
    determine formal charges against a judge, the Investigative Panel retains the
    authority to enter into stipulations for proposed discipline with the judge or judge’s
    representatives. After the commencement of the hearing to determine formal
    charges against a judge, the Hearing Panel shall have the authority to enter into
    stipulations for proposed discipline with the judge or judge’s representative, which
    it shall incorporate into its recommendation to the Supreme Court.
    (b) In all proceedings before the Hearing Panel, the Florida Rules of Civil
    Procedure shall be applicable except where inappropriate or as otherwise provided
    by these rules.
    (c)    Summary Judgment is not available to either party.
    (d) Special Counsel shall, upon written demand of a party or counsel of
    record, promptly furnish the following:
    The names and addresses of all witnesses whose testimony the Special
    Counsel expects to offer at the hearing, together with copies of all written
    statements and transcripts of testimony of such witnesses in the possession of the
    counsel or the Investigative Panel which are relevant to the subject matter of the
    hearing and which have not previously been furnished, except those documents
    confidential under the Constitution of the State. When good cause is shown this
    rule may be waived.
    (de) At the time and place set for hearing, the Hearing Panel may proceed
    with the hearing whether or not the judge has filed an Answer or appears at the
    hearing.
    RULE 14. EVIDENCE
    (a) At a hearing before theThe Hearing Panel, legal evidence only shall
    be received and oral evidence shall be taken only on oath or affirmation has wide
    - 15 -
    latitude to admit or exclude evidence and is not bound by the technical rules of
    evidence. It may admit evidence that is relevant and reliable as described in The
    Florida Bar v. Tobkin, 
    944 So. 2d 219
    (Fla. 2006).
    (b) Past disciplinary actions by the Commission may be admitted by the
    Hearing Panel to demonstrate a relevant factual matter such as a pattern of
    conduct, or, upon a finding of guilt, to properly assess the appropriate sanction to
    recommend to the Supreme Court.
    RULE 20. CERTIFICATION OF HEARING PANEL
    RECOMMENDATIONS TO SUPREME COURT
    (a) If the Hearing Panel dismisses the formal charges, the Hearing Panel
    shall promptly file a copy of the dismissal order certified by the Chair of the
    Hearing Panel with the Clerk of the Supreme Court. Upon making a determination
    recommending discipline, retirement or removal of a judge, the Hearing Panel shall
    file a copy of the recommendation certified by the Chair of the Hearing Panel,
    together with a transcript and the findings and conclusions, with the Clerk of the
    Supreme Court and shall mail to the judge and to the judge’s attorney(s) notice of
    such filing, together with a copy of such recommendations, findings, and
    conclusions.
    (b) The Hearing Panel may designate filings with the Supreme Court, or
    portions of documents therein, as confidential. The confidential information shall
    be described without revealing the confidential information, consistent with the
    procedure contained in Rule 2.420 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration.
    The materials that may be designated as confidential include those items listed in
    Rule 2.420, or other medical and psychological records, or filings referencing
    those materials. The materials designated as confidential by the Commission shall
    remain so, subject to review by, and further order of the Supreme Court.
    (REPEALED)
    (c) If the Hearing Panel determines to recommend removal, it may also
    include in its findings and recommendations that the judge be suspended with or
    without pay pending the final determination of the inquiry.
    RULE 22. SUBPOENAS
    Subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of
    documentary evidence shall be issued as follows:
    - 16 -
    (a) For investigative purposes, subpoenas may be issued for the
    attendance of witnesses and the production of documents before the General
    Counsel or Special Counsel with respect to any potential violation of the Code of
    Judicial Conduct, and counsel is empowered to administer oaths to all who are
    summonsed to testify or who may voluntarily appear before counsel to testify as to
    any potential violations of the Canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
    (b) Subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of
    documentary evidence for discovery after formal charges are filed, and for the
    appearance of any person before anythe Hearing pPanel of the Commission, may
    be issued by the General Counsel, Counsel to the Hearing Panel, or Special
    Counsel, or counsel for the judge, and may be served in the manner provided by
    law for the service of witness subpoenas in a civil action, but without cost.
    (c) Contempt. Any person who, without adequate excuse, fails to obey
    such a subpoena of the Commission or a panel of the Commission served upon that
    person may be cited for contempt of the Commission in the manner provided in
    these rules.
    RULE 25. DISQUALIFICATION OR VACANCY
    (a) Whenever a judge against whom formal proceedings have been
    instituted, shall file with the Hearing Panel an affidavit that the judge fears the
    judge will not receive a fair hearing before the Hearing Panel on the charges
    because of the prejudice of one or more members of the Hearing Panel against the
    judge, and the facts stated as the basis for making the affidavit shall be supported
    in substance by affidavit of at least two reputable citizens of the State of Florida
    not kin to the judge or the judge’s attorney, or if any member of the Hearing Panel
    shall voluntarily recuse himself, such member or members of the Hearing Panel
    shall proceed no further therein and shall be disqualified from hearing the charges.
    The affidavit shall state the facts and the reasons for the belief that any such
    prejudice exists, shall specify the member(s) of the Hearing Panel allegedly
    prejudiced and shall be filed not more than 15 days after service of the Notice of
    Formal Charges upon the judge chargedAfter the filing of formal charges, a judge
    may move to disqualify a member of the Hearing Panel. The motion shall be in
    writing, sworn to by the judge, and shall specifically allege the facts and reasons
    that establish a legally sufficient factual basis for disqualification.
    - 17 -
    (1) Grounds. A motion to disqualify shall show facts would place
    a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial hearing if
    the Hearing Panel member participates.
    (2) Time. A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable
    time not to exceed 15 days after the Hearing Panel members are identified, or the
    discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion and shall be promptly
    presented to the Hearing Panel for an immediate ruling. A motion made during
    hearing shall be ruled on immediately.
    (3) Determination. The Hearing Panel shall determine whether the
    facts alleged are sufficient to support a motion to disqualify. The matter of
    disqualification shall be by a majority vote of the panel.
    (4) Member’s Initiative. If any member of the Hearing Panel
    voluntarily recuses him or herself, the member shall not participate in the hearing.
    (b) The ChairExecutive Director of the Commission shall request from
    each of the appointing authorities a list of four persons who may temporarily serve
    in the absence of incapacitated or disqualified members. The appointing authorities
    are the Conference of District Court of Appeal Judges, the Conference of Circuit
    Court Judges, the Conference of County Court Judges, the Board of Governors of
    The Florida Bar, and the Governor of Florida. Upon the disqualification of or in
    the absence of a member of the Hearing Panel, the replacement shall be chosen by
    the Chair of the Commission from those listed by the appropriate appointing
    authority. Each such replacement shall be from the same category as the
    disqualified member(s) set forth in Section 12(a), Article V of the Constitution of
    the State of Florida.
    (c) The judge may within 15 days after receiving notice of such ad hoc
    appointment, file a like affidavit as to that appointee, which shall be supported in
    substance by an affidavit of two citizens as set forth above, in which event the ad
    hoc appointee shall not be disqualified on account of alleged prejudice against the
    judge unless the appointee admits that it is then a fact that the appointee is
    prejudiced against the judge, or unless a majority of the Hearing Panel, which may
    include any ad hoc appointee, holds that the appointee is prejudiced against the
    judge, in which event the same ad hoc appointment procedure set forth above shall
    be followed until a qualified person has been appointed.
    (d) A judge moved against by the Commission may, by affidavit, suggest
    the disqualification of a member or members of the Commission unsupported by
    - 18 -
    two citizens, but in such event the determination of the matter of disqualification
    shall be by majority vote of the panel having jurisdiction unless the person sought
    to be disqualified voluntarily recuses himself.
    (e) Upon the vacancy of a position on the Commission due to resignation
    or ineligibility as a member of the Commission, or upon the failure of the
    appointing authority to timely appoint a constituent member, the Chair shall
    appoint an ad hoc member from a list provided by the appropriate appointing
    authority. Each such replacement shall be from the same category as the
    disqualified member(s) set forth in Section 12(a), Article V of the Constitution of
    the State of Florida, and shall serve only until the appointing authority selects a
    representative to fill the vacancy.
    - 19 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC17-1362

Citation Numbers: 252 So. 3d 733

Filed Date: 8/30/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023