Danny MacY v. State ( 2002 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-02-00124-CR
NO. 03-02-00125-CR
NO. 03-02-00126-CR
Danny Macy, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOS. 3010360, 3010361 & 3010362, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING
In each of these causes, the district court found appellant Danny Macy guilty of aggravated
assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 22.02 (West 1994). Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief
concluding that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why
there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.
1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137
(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the records and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous
and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel=s motions
to withdraw are granted.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
__________________________________________
Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed: November 15, 2002
Do Not Publish
2