Douglas Sinclair v. State of Florida , 199 So. 3d 374 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                         IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
    DOUGLAS SINCLAIR,                       NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    Petitioner,                       DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    v.                                      CASE NO. 1D16-2461
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Respondent.
    ___________________________/
    Opinion filed August 16, 2016.
    Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.
    Douglas Sinclair, pro se, Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM.
    Douglas Sinclair has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus claiming he is
    being held on a void judgment because no information was pending at the time of trial.
    We dismiss the petition. See Baker v. State, 
    878 So. 2d 1236
     (Fla. 2004) (habeas
    corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct
    appeal or in postconviction motions).
    Sinclair has raised this same argument at least five times in this court, and each
    time has failed to obtain relief. See Sinclair v. State, 
    134 So. 3d 457
     (Fla. 1st DCA
    2014); Sinclair v. State, 
    132 So. 3d 903
     (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Sinclair v. State, 
    147 So. 3d 33
     (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Sinclair v. State, 
    118 So. 3d 810
     (Fla. 1st DCA 2013);
    Sinclair v. State, 
    114 So. 3d 943
     (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The last time he raised this
    argument, we warned him that future frivolous filings could result in a prohibition on
    any further pro se filings. See Sinclair v. State, 
    132 So. 3d 903
     (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
    Accordingly, after receiving the present petition, we ordered petitioner to show cause
    why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings challenging his judgment
    and sentence. See State v. Spencer, 
    751 So. 2d 47
    , 48 (Fla. 1999). Petitioner’s
    response to the show cause order does not provide a legal basis to prohibit the
    imposition of sanctions.
    Therefore, because petitioner’s repeated attacks on his judgment and sentence
    have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se
    filings in the court concerning Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2000-CF-
    009964-A. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings
    concerning this case unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida
    Bar.
    DISMISSED.
    2
    LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-2461

Citation Numbers: 199 So. 3d 374

Filed Date: 8/15/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023