-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 141 A. 919, 104 N.J.L. 662
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/14/1928
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023