-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None. *Page 304
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 174 A. 900, 113 N.J.L. 303
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 9/27/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023