-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 191 A. 878, 118 N.J.L. 183
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/30/1937
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023