Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1983 )


Menu:
  •                                              The Attorney           General of Texas
    August 2, 1983
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    Supreme        Court      Building          Mr. Charles Travis                      Opinion No. JM-52
    P.O.Box 12546                               Executive Director
    martin.     TX.     78711.    2548          Texas Parks and Wildlife Department     Re:   Whether provisions in
    5121475-2601                                4200 Smith School Road                  Senate Bill No. 94 repealing
    Telex    9101874-1367
    Austin, Texas   78744                   certain provisions for fur-
    Telecopier     5121475~0266
    bearing animals are effective
    1607 Main         St.. Suite 1400           Dear Mr. Travis:
    Oa,,as.     TX.    75201-4709
    2141742.6944
    You have requested an interpretation of article 1, section 37 of
    Senate Bill No. 94, which was enacted by the Sixty-eighth Legislature
    4824 Alberta            Ave.. Suite   160   to repeal numerous provisions of the Parks and Wildlife Code. We
    El Pas,. TX.            79905-2793          believe that each provision of the code that is listed in section 37
    y.iq533.3484                                is repealed on the effective date of a proclamation of the Parks and
    Wildlife Commission that regulates the conduct proscribed by that
    1220 Dallas Ave.. Suite 202                 provision.
    “ouston,   TX. 77002-6966
    7131650-0666                                     "A fundamental rule in the construction of statutes is to
    ascertain and give effect to the intent of the Legislature." Jessen
    606 Broadway.             Suite 312
    Associates, Inc. v. Bullock, 
    531 S.W.2d 593
    , 599 (Tex. 1975). Senate
    Lubbock,         TX.    79401-3479         Bill No. 94 was enacted to place conservation control and game
    8061747.5238                               management under the sole authority of the 'Parks and Wildlife
    Department. See Bill Analysis to Senate Bill No. 94, prepared for
    House Committee on Environmental Affairs, filed in Bill File to Senate
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite B
    MCAII~~. TX. 76501-1685
    Bill No. 94, Legislative Reference Library.        In so doing, the
    5121682-4547
    legislature repealed the provisions of the code included in article 1,
    section 36 of the bill on the effective date of the act, which is
    August 29, 1983. The legislature repealed numerous other provisions
    200 Main        Plaza, Suite 400           of the code in section 37, but with the intention that the repeal not
    San      Anfonio.    TX. 78205-2797
    be effective until the Parks and Wildlife Commission by proclamation
    5121225-4191
    regulates the conduct controlled by each of those provisions. section
    37 states that the provisions "are repealed," but "effective as
    An Equal         OpportunityI              provided by Section 61.004, Parks and Wildlife Code." Section 61.004
    Affirmative        Action     Employer
    provides that a law making chapter 61 of the Parks and Wildlife Code
    applicable to all or a portion of the wildlife resources of a county
    or place repeals any provision of general or special law regulating
    the taking or possession of those wildlife resources when the
    commission's proclamation relating to those wildlife resources takes
    effect.
    We believe that when the legislature referred to section 61.004
    in section 37 of the bill, it simply meant to adopt the method set
    forth therein. In other words, its intent was that the statutes
    Mr. Charles Travis - Page 2    (JM-52)
    7
    listed in section 37 would be deemed to be repealed only when a
    proclamation issued by the commission takes effect. We do not believe
    that it ever contemplated that the proclamations to be issued could
    affect only those statutes pertaining to wildlife resources that are
    under the regulatory authority in chapter 61. Otherwise, the listing
    of statutes in section 37 other than those pertaining to conduct that
    is regulated under chapter 61 could only be regarded as an idle
    gesture because a Parks and Wildlife Commission proclamation could
    never reach those statutes.
    Therefore, it is our opinion that the legislature clearly
    intended to repeal all statutes listed in section 37, but that the
    repeal would become effective only on the effective date of a
    proclamation issued by the Parks and Wildlife Commission.      See
    McDonald v. State, 
    615 S.W.2d 214
    , 219 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).
    SUMMARY
    The legislature repealed each provision of the
    Parks and Wildlife Code enumerated in article 1,
    section 37, Senate Bill No. 94, Acts of the
    Sixty-eighth Legislature, including provisions
    relating to fur-bearing animals, on the effective
    date of a proclamation of the Parks and Glildlife
    Commission regulating the conduct proscribed by
    that provision.
    J-h Very truly you
    JIM
    .
    MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Nancy Sutton
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpin, Acting Chairman
    Jon Bible
    David Brooks
    Colin Carl
    Jim Moellinger
    Nancy Sutton
    Bruce Youngblood
    P. 219
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-52

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1983

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017