Mikkilineni v. The City of Houston ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 98-20430
    Conference Calendar
    M.R. MIKKILINENI,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    THE CITY OF HOUSTON;   THE UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,   Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration; JUAN   PADRON; HAROLD DARK; JOHN LAWSON;
    ROBIN HORNING; DENIS   LLOYD; RUSSELL MAI;
    PHILIP BARNARD; GARY   ORADAT,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. CV-94-H-3552
    - - - - - - - - - -
    February 10, 1999
    Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*
    PER CURIAM:**
    M.R. Mikkilineni, proceeding pro se, requests leave to
    proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the dismissal of
    his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6).     A movant
    for IFP on appeal must show that he is a pauper and that he will
    present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal.    See Carson v. Polley,
    *
    This matter is being decided by a quorum.   28 U.S.C. §
    46(d).
    **
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 98-20430
    -2-
    
    689 F.2d 562
    , 586 (5th Cir. 1982).   Mikkilineni has not explained
    the issues that he intends to raise on appeal and thus, has not
    made the required showing that he will present a nonfrivolous
    issue on appeal.   See 
    Carson, 689 F.2d at 586
    .   Accordingly, the
    motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP is DENIED.
    Furthermore, Mikkilineni may not obtain an appeal of the
    final judgment by appealing from the denial of a successive Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.   See Burnside v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.,
    
    519 F.2d 1127
    , 1128 (5th Cir. 1975).
    Mikkilineni’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.   Mikkilineni
    is warned that future frivolous appeals will invite the
    imposition of sanctions.   Mikkilineni should review any pending
    appeals to ensure that they do not raise frivolous arguments.
    IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION
    WARNING ISSUED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-20430

Filed Date: 2/23/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/15/2015