Pruett, Robert Lynn ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                        WR-62,099-04
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Transmitted 4/20/2015 3:52:54 PM
    Accepted 4/20/2015 4:28:24 PM
    ABEL ACOSTA
    CLERK
    No. WR-62,099-04
    RECEIVED
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    4/20/2015
    IN THE                        ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK
    COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS
    FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
    Ex parte Robert Lynn Pruett,
    Applicant.
    _________________________________
    MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE LAWRENCE MEYERS
    _________________________________
    CAPITAL CASE
    MR. PRUETT IS SCHEDULED TO BE EXECUTED ON APRIL 28, 2015.
    _________________________________
    David R. Dow
    Texas Bar No. 06064900
    ddow@central.uh.edu
    University of Houston Law Center
    100 Law Center
    Houston, Texas 77204-6060
    TEL: (713) 743-2171
    FAX: (713) 743-2131
    No. WR-62,099-04
    IN THE
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
    Ex parte Robert Lynn Pruett,
    Applicant.
    _________________________________
    MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE LAWRENCE MEYERS
    _________________________________
    To avoid any appearance of impropriety and promote public confidence in
    the integrity of the judiciary, Relator-Petitioner Robert Lynn Pruett asks that Judge
    Lawrence Meyers recuse himself, or be recused by the Court, from further
    participation in this case. The basis for this motion is that Judge Meyers, on April
    1, dissented from this Court’s order granting counsel leave to appear on behalf of
    Pruett. His dissent, indicating he does not believe counsel should be able to file
    anything on behalf of Pruett, would cause a reasonable person to question his
    impartiality in this case.
    The grounds for recusal of appellate judges are the same as the grounds for
    the recusal of trial judges. See Tex. R. App. P. 16.2. Under Texas Rule of Civil
    Procedure 18b(2), a judge must recuse himself in any proceeding in which:
    (a)    his impartiality might reasonably be questioned;
    (b)    he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning the subject matter or a
    party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning
    the proceeding.
    Tex. R. Civ. P. 18b(2)(a), (b).
    The standard for assessing judicial bias in this context is whether the
    allegation of lack of impartiality is grounded on facts that would create doubts
    concerning the judge’s impartiality – not in the mind of the judge himself, or even,
    necessarily, in the mind of the party filing the motion, but rather in the mind of a
    reasonable person with knowledge of all the circumstances involved. Kemp v.
    State, 
    846 S.W.2d 289
    , 305 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); see Rogers v. Bradley, 
    909 S.W.2d 872
    , 880-82 (Tex. 1995) (Enoch, J., responding to declaration of recusal).
    The language of the rule is mandatory. The standard is an objective one: It
    requires “the judge to recuse if ‘his impartiality might reasonably be questioned,’
    regardless of the source or circumstances giving rise to the question of impartiality
    and even though the source and circumstances may be beyond the judge’s volition
    or control.” 
    Rogers, 909 S.W.2d at 874
    (Gammage, J., declaration of recusal).
    Because of Judge Meyers’ decision to dissent to this Court’s order granting
    undersigned counsel leave to appear, his impartiality with respect to any pleadings
    for which counsel might seek leave to appear might reasonably be questioned by a
    reasonable person. The dissent creates at least the appearance that he is biased
    against counsel (or at least against counsel’s being granted leave to appear during
    his suspension).
    PRAYER FOR RELIEF
    For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Pruett asks that Judge Meyers recuse himself,
    or be recused by this Court, from the case.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    s/ David R. Dow1
    __________________________
    David R. Dow
    Texas Bar No. 06064900
    University of Houston Law Center
    100 Law Center
    Houston, Texas 77204-6060
    Tel. (713) 743-2171
    Fax (713) 743-2131
    Counsel for Robert Pruett
    1
    On April 16, 2015, a motion for leave for counsel to appear in this cause number was filed.
    The motion remains pending. Though counsel has yet to be granted leave to appear, he feels it
    incumbent upon him to file this motion today, so as not to violate this Court’s Miscellaneous
    Rule 11-003.
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that on the 20th day of April 2015, a true and correct copy of the
    above legal document was delivered via email to:
    Jefferson Clendenin
    Assistant Attorney General
    Criminal Appeals Division
    P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
    Austin, Texas 78711
    Tel. (512) 936-1600
    Fax (512) 320-8132
    Email jay.clendenin@texasattorneygeneral.gov
    Melinda Fletcher
    Special Prosecution Unit
    mfletcher@sputexas.org
    s/ David R. Dow
    _________________________
    David R. Dow
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-62,099-04

Filed Date: 4/20/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016