Garza v. Talbert , 345 F. App'x 871 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-6457
    JOSE LUIS GARZA,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN WAYNE TALBERT,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02210-H)
    Submitted:    August 27, 2009                 Decided:   October 2, 2009
    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jose Luis Garza, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    Assistant  Attorney  General,   Raleigh, North  Carolina,  for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jose Luis Garza seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006) petition.
    The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge
    issues     a    certificate          of    appealability.            See     
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).            A certificate of appealability will not
    issue    absent       “a   substantial           showing    of    the     denial    of     a
    constitutional        right.”         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)       (2006).        A
    prisoner       satisfies       this        standard        by    demonstrating          that
    reasonable       jurists      would       find    that     any    assessment       of     the
    constitutional        claims    by    the    district       court    is    debatable       or
    wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
    court is likewise debatable.                     See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                                 We
    have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Garza
    has not made the requisite showing.                        Accordingly, we deny a
    certificate      of    appealability          and     dismiss     the     appeal.          We
    dispense       with    oral    argument          because    the     facts    and        legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-6457

Citation Numbers: 345 F. App'x 871

Judges: Agee, Duncan, Niemeyer, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 10/2/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023