Sikka v. Rumsfeld , 133 F. App'x 868 ( 2005 )

PER CURIAM.

Mahesh C. Sikka appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for Defendants on Sikka’s Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sikka v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-895-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED