Poareo v. Johnson , 44 F. App'x 456 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                                                                          F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    AUG 29 2002
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    ALBERT POAREO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,                      No. 02-2136
    v.                                            (D.C. No. CIV-02-141-BB/LCS)
    GARY JOHNSON, Governor, State of                     (D. New Mexico)
    New Mexico; and ROBERT PERRY,
    Secretary of Corrections,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
    After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has
    determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
    determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
    The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
    This is a pro se state prisoner § 1983 civil rights appeal claiming that
    certain New Mexico statutes are unconstitutional and that certain programs and
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
    doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
    generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
    and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    actions of the New Mexico Corrections Department constitute Eighth Amendment
    violations. Mr. Poareo sought equitable relief and nominal damages. The district
    court dismissed the complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust
    administrative remedies. Mr. Poareo appeals to this court.
    We agree with the district court that Appellant “may not prosecute his
    claims in this Court unless and until he exhausts administrative remedies.” Order
    at 2. After a thorough review of the brief and the record and for substantially the
    same reasons set forth in the district court’s well-reasoned April 22, 2002, Order,
    we hold that no relief is available to Mr. Poareo pursuant to § 1983.
    The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. We remind Appellant
    that because his motion to proceed without prepayment of the appellate filing fee
    was granted, he must continue making partial payments on court fees and costs
    previously assessed until such have been paid in full.
    Entered for the Court
    Monroe G. McKay
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2136

Citation Numbers: 44 F. App'x 456

Judges: Kelly, McKAY, Murphy

Filed Date: 8/29/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023