Chris Kohler v. Csk Auto, Inc. , 644 F. App'x 750 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    MAR 10 2016
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    CHRIS KOHLER,                                    No. 14-55317
    Plaintiff - Appellant,             D.C. No. 3:12-cv-03022-JM-
    WMC
    v.
    CSK AUTO, INC., DBA O’Reilly Auto                MEMORANDUM*
    Parts #2941,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Jeffrey T. Miller, Senior District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted February 11, 2016**
    Pasadena, California
    Before: FARRIS, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    Chris Kohler appeals the district court’s order entering summary judgment
    in favor of CSK Auto, Inc. in Kohler’s action under the Americans with
    Disabilities Act. We vacate and remand for further proceedings.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    The related case upon which the district court relied to apply the doctrine of
    issue preclusion, Kohler v. Midway Land, LLC, No. 12-cv-0148 JM (WMc), 
    2013 WL 10733705
     (S.D. Cal., Apr. 5, 2013) (“Midway”), was vacated in part by this
    Court on appeal with respect to whether the slopes of the parking spaces and access
    aisles in the challenged parking area were ADA-compliant. See Kohler v. Midway
    Land, LLC, 592 F. App’x 622 (9th Cir. 2015). Thus, Kohler is not here precluded
    from claiming that the slopes were not ADA-compliant. We vacate the district
    court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of CSK on this ground and
    remand for further proceedings.
    We decline to affirm the district court’s order on the alternative ground that
    Kohler failed to submit evidence to show that the parking area of the shopping
    center was within the control of CSK. See Katz v. Children’s Hospital of Orange
    County, 
    28 F.3d 1520
    , 1534 (9th Cir. 1994). Nowhere in CSK’s moving papers
    was this issue raised as a ground for granting CSK summary judgment.
    Costs awarded to Kohler.
    VACATED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this
    disposition.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-55317

Citation Numbers: 644 F. App'x 750

Filed Date: 3/10/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023