Brooks v. State , 406 S.W.3d 489 ( 2013 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jasmine Brooks appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value.. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

1 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2012, unless otherwise indicated.