Akm Haque v. Eric H. Holder Jr. , 471 F. App'x 763 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            MAR 14 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    AKM SHAMSUL HAQUE,                               No. 08-71422
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A095-629-961
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted March 6, 2012 **
    Before:        B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    Akm Shamsul Haque, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal.
    We have jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review for substantial evidence
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    the agency’s factual findings and review de novo its legal conclusions. Wakkary v.
    Holder, 
    558 F.3d 1049
    , 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We grant the petition for review and
    we remand.
    Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s nexus determination
    because Haque’s testimony established that he articulated his political opposition
    to rival party members and that the subsequent attacks and extortion were
    motivated, at least in part, on account of his political opinion. See Borja v. INS,
    
    175 F.3d 732
    , 735-37 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc). Because the agency erred in its
    nexus determination, it did not fully consider Haque’s claim of past persecution
    and whether Haque has a presumption of future persecution. See Recinos de Leon
    v. Gonzales, 
    400 F.3d 1185
    , 1191-92 (9th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we grant the
    petition as to Haque’s withholding of removal claim and remand for further
    proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 
    537 U.S. 12
    ,
    16-18 (2002) (per curiam).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
    2                                    08-71422
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-71422

Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 763

Judges: Fletcher, Reinhardt, Tashima

Filed Date: 3/14/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023