-
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3402 ___________________________ Jack R. T. Jordan lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. U.S. Department of Labor lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent Dyncorp International, L.L.C. lllllllllllllllllllllInterested party - Intervenor ___________________________ No. 20-3404 ___________________________ Jack R. T. Jordan lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. U.S. Department of Labor lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent Dyncorp International, L.L.C. lllllllllllllllllllllInterested party - Intervenor ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor (except OSHA) ____________ Submitted: November 2, 2021 Filed: November 5, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, Jack Jordan petitions for review of final orders from the United States Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB). After careful review, we conclude the ARB’s decisions were not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to the law, or unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. See 49 U.S.C. § 31105(d) (appellate court reviews ARB’s decision pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act); 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (reviewing court shall hold unlawful and set aside agency decision found to be arbitrary, capricious, abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, or if unsupported by substantial evidence in record). Accordingly, we deny Jordan’s petition in each case. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Document Info
Docket Number: 20-3402
Filed Date: 11/5/2021
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2021