Lalonde v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-0186V
    UNPUBLISHED
    MARYLOU LALONDE,                                            Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                           Filed: November 16, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Tetanus Diphtheria acellular
    Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Respondent.                            Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (SIRVA)
    Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.
    Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On February 21, 2020, Marylou LaLonde filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis
    (“Tdap”) vaccine on May 31, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶ 2. The case was assigned to the Special
    Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On July 12, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
    compensation for her SIRVA. On November 15, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $95,000.00,
    representing compensation for her pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer,
    1
    Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E -
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If , upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $95,000.00, representing compensation for her pain and suffering
    in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for
    all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint f iling of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    MARYLOU LALONDE,                     )
    )
    Petitioner,              )
    )  No. 20-186V
    v.                            )   Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )   ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     )
    )
    Respondent.             )
    ____________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Procedural History
    On July 12, 2021, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that petitioner
    sustained the onset of a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) within
    the Table time period following a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine, and
    therefore sustained an injury that is compensable under the terms of the National Childhood
    Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§300aa-10 to -34. ECF No. 30.
    Accordingly, on July 12, 2021, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding
    that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for SIRVA following the Tdap vaccine she
    received on May 31, 2018. ECF No. 31.
    II.    Items of Compensation
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $95,000.00 for pain and suffering.
    This represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42
    U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    III.   Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and
    the Court’s judgment award the following 1: a lump sum payment of $95,000.00, in the form of a
    check payable to petitioner.
    IV.    Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Marylou LaLonde:                              $95,000.00
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    TRACI R. PATTON
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and
    suffering.
    2
    s/Christine Mary Becer
    CHRISTINE MARY BECER
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-3665
    Christine.m.becer@usdoj.gov
    DATED: November 15, 2021
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-186

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/17/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/17/2021