Richards v. Angelone , 51 F. App'x 417 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-7028
    MARK E. RICHARDS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-01-176-3)
    Submitted:    November 7, 2002            Decided:     November 26, 2002
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mark E. Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Mark E. Richards, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the
    magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).*   We have reviewed the record and conclude
    in part for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge that
    Richards has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
    constitutional right.   See Richards v. Angelone, CA-01-176-3 (E.D.
    Va. June 27, 2002). We further find Richards’ claims regarding his
    parole revocation hearing were barred by the one year limitations
    period.   See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2244
    (d) (2000); Crawley v. Cato, 
    257 F.3d 395
    , 399 (4th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 
    122 S. Ct. 811
     (2002).
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal.   See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c) (2000).     We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    By consent of the parties, the decision below was rendered
    by a magistrate judge. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c) (2000).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-7028

Citation Numbers: 51 F. App'x 417

Judges: Gregory, Luttig, Per Curiam, Williams

Filed Date: 11/26/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023