United States v. Cornelison , 79 F. App'x 2 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 21, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-50442
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    EDWARD DONOVAN CORNELISON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. W-98-CR-118-1
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Edward Donovan Cornelison appeals his sentence following the
    revocation of his supervised release.   His sole contention is
    that the district court erred when it did not sentence him to the
    low end of the Guideline range.
    With respect to imprisonment after violation of supervised
    release, the Guidelines Manual sets forth “policy statements
    only.”   See Guidelines Manual, Chapter 7, Pt. A, ¶ 1.     Thus, this
    court will uphold Cornelison’s sentence unless it is in violation
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 03-50442
    -2-
    of law or plainly unreasonable.     United States v. Pena, 
    125 F.3d 285
    , 287 (5th Cir. 1997).   The argument that a sentence
    promulgated after probation revocation is in error because it is
    not at the low end of the Guideline range is foreclosed by our
    holding in United States v. Teran, 
    98 F.3d 831
    , 836 (5th Cir.
    1996), in which we held that there are no applicable Guidelines
    for sentencing after revocation of probation.     See 
    Pena, 125 F.3d at 287
    .
    The district court implicitly considered the factors set
    forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).     See 
    Pena, 125 F.3d at 286-87
    .
    Additionally, Cornelison’s original offense, possession with
    intent to distribute amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.
    § 841(a)(1), is a Class C felony.     18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(3);
    21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C).   A defendant whose supervised release
    term is revoked may not be required to serve more than two years
    in prison if the charge that resulted in the term of supervised
    release is a Class C felony.    18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3).   Thus, the
    24-month sentence did not exceed the maximum provided by statute
    and was therefore legal.    See 
    Pena, 125 F.3d at 288
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-50442

Citation Numbers: 79 F. App'x 2

Judges: Jolly, King, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 10/20/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2023