United States v. Garcia-Gonzalez , 82 F. App'x 910 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 10, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-40812
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JOEL GARCIA-GONZALEZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. C-03-CR-18-1
    --------------------
    Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Joel Garcia-Gonzalez appeals his sentence following his
    guilty plea conviction for being found in the United States,
    without permission, subsequent to deportation following a
    conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    .   Garcia-Gonzalez argues that the district court erred by
    enhancing his base offense level sixteen levels pursuant to
    U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(vii), based on a determination that his
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 03-40812
    -2-
    prior conviction for transporting an unlawful alien was an alien
    smuggling offense committed for profit.
    In United States v. Solis-Campozano, 
    312 F.3d 164
    , 167-68
    (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 
    123 S. Ct. 1811
     (2003), this court
    held that the term “alien smuggling offense,” as used in U.S.S.G.
    § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) includes the offense of transporting aliens
    within the United States.   Accordingly, the district court did
    not err in sentencing Garcia-Gonzalez under that guideline.
    Garcia-Gonzalez concedes that his argument is foreclosed by
    Solis-Campozano.   He raises the issue solely to preserve it for
    possible further review.
    The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of
    filing an appellee’s brief.   In its motion, the Government asks
    that an appellee’s brief not be required.   The motion is GRANTED.
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-40812

Citation Numbers: 82 F. App'x 910

Judges: Davis, Dennis, Emilio, Garza, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 12/9/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2023