United States v. Ricardo Nathanilian Johnson-Cuervo , 138 F. App'x 277 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FILED
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ________________________  ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    JUNE 29, 2005
    No. 04-15162                 THOMAS K. KAHN
    Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 04-20216-CR-CMA
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    RICARDO NATHANILIAN JOHNSON-CUERVO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    _________________________
    (June 29, 2005)
    Before ANDERSON, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Ricardo Nathanilian Johnson-Cuervo appeals his concurrent sentences for
    importation of morphine, 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 952
    (a) and 960(b)(3), and possession with
    intent to distribute morphine, 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), contending the
    use of an unproven and unadmitted drug quantity to impose sentences under a
    mandatory Guidelines scheme violated his Sixth Amendment rights, as set forth in
    United States v. Booker, 
    125 S. Ct. 738
     (2005).
    Because Johnson-Cuervo preserved a Blakely/Booker objection in the
    district court, we review the challenge to his sentence de novo. United States v.
    Paz, 
    405 F.3d 946
    , 948 (11th Cir. 2005). Booker error must be disregarded if it
    was harmless. 
    Id.
     To find harmless error, we must determine the error did not
    affect the defendant’s substantial rights. A constitutional error, such as Booker
    error, does not affect substantial rights, if it is harmless beyond a reasonable
    doubt. 
    Id.
     This standard is met only where it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt
    the error did not contribute to the sentence obtained. The government has the
    burden of showing the error did not affect the defendant’s substantial rights. 
    Id.
    The Government has not attempted to carry its burden of showing the error
    was harmless. Instead, the Government concedes error and joins Johnson-Cuervo
    2
    in requesting a remand for resentencing. Accordingly, we vacate Johnson-
    Cuervo’s sentences and remand for resentencing.
    VACATED AND REMANDED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15162

Citation Numbers: 138 F. App'x 277

Judges: Anderson, Barkett, Black, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/29/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023