United States v. Brian Adams ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 18-10587      Document: 00514795227        Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/15/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 18-10587                     United States Court of Appeals
    Conference Calendar
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    January 15, 2019
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff−Appellee,
    versus
    BRIAN ANTHONY ADAMS,
    Defendant−Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    No. 3:16-CR-246-1
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brian Adams has
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
    5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-10587      Document: 00514795227    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/15/2019
    No. 18-10587
    moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
    (5th Cir. 2011).
    Adams has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel-
    evant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
    appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    There is a clerical error in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.
    Specifically, as to the conviction of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a
    drug trafficking crime, the judgment mistakenly referred to 18 U.S.C.
    § 924(c)(1)(C)(i) as the applicable statute instead of the correct statute,
    § 924(c)(1)(A)(i).   Subsection (c)(1)(C)(i) provides for a 25-year mandatory
    minimum sentence for a second or subsequent § 924(c) offense, while
    § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) provides for a five-year mandatory minimum.
    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
    excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for the limited purpose of
    correction of the clerical error to reflect that Adams was sentenced under
    § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-10587

Filed Date: 1/15/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021