Conkling v. Krandusky , 139 A.D. 925 ( 1910 )

Judgment aflfirmed¡ with costs. See opinion by .Spring, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 127 Appellate Division, 761. All concurred, except ■McLennan, P. J., and Kruse, J., who dissented on the grounds stated in the opinion by McLennan, P. J., on the former appeal.