John Williams v. Max Mobley , 275 F. App'x 573 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 07-1640
    ___________
    John Henry Williams, ADC #93081          *
    *
    Appellant,                   *
    *
    v.                                 *   Appeal from the United States
    *   District Court for the
    Max Mobley, Chief Deputy, Arkansas       *   Eastern District of Arkansas.
    Department of Correction; Greg           *
    Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas            *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    Regional Unit, ADC; Dottie               *
    Yarbrough, CMS Infirmary Manager,        *
    East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC;        *
    Shirley Crawford, R.N., East Arkansas    *
    Regional Unit, ADC; Flora Jones, R.N.,   *
    East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC;        *
    Lisa Montgomery, R.N., East Arkansas     *
    Regional Unit, ADC; Joseph Spears,       *
    R.N., East Arkansas Regional Unit,       *
    ADC; Shelat Farmer, Dr., East            *
    Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Polly       *
    James, A.R.O., East Arkansas Regional    *
    Unit, ADC; Charles E. Jackson, Sgt.,     *
    East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC;        *
    Didi Lockhart, CMS Grievance             *
    Manager, East Arkansas Regional Unit,    *
    ADC; Jimmy Banks, Assistant Warden,      *
    East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC,        *
    originally sued as Terry Banks; Zina     *
    Ousley, CMS Infirmary Manager, East      *
    Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC,             *
    originally sued as Zina Ousely; Linda    *
    Driver, CMS Medical Records, East        *
    Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC,              *
    originally sued as Carolyn Driver,        *
    *
    Appellees.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 24, 2008
    Filed: April 28, 2008
    ___________
    Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Arkansas inmate John Henry Williams appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant
    of summary judgment in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action. We agree with the district court
    that summary judgment was warranted, see Roe v. Crawford, 
    514 F.3d 789
    , 793 (8th
    Cir. 2008) (standard of review); and that Williams provided no basis under Federal
    Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b) for reconsidering the grant of summary
    judgment, see Christensen v. Qwest Pension Plan, 
    462 F.3d 913
    , 919-20 (8th Cir.
    2006) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) standard of review); Arnold v. Wood, 
    238 F.3d 992
    , 998
    (8th Cir. 2001) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) standard of review). We decline to consider
    Williams’s new evidence and allegations. See Minn. Supply Co. v. Raymond Corp.,
    
    472 F.3d 524
    , 532 (8th Cir. 2006) (this court considers only evidence before district
    court when summary judgment ruling was made); Stone v. Harry, 
    364 F.3d 912
    , 914-
    15 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to address pro se arguments first raised on appeal).
    Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Williams’s pending
    motions.
    1
    The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c).
    -2-