United States v. Julio Meza-Sanchez , 433 F. App'x 837 ( 2011 )

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15953 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar JULY 11, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00303-SDM-MAP-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JULIO MEZA-SANCHEZ
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(July 11, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Thomas Truskoski, appointed counsel for Julio Meza-Sanchez in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Meza-Sanchez’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED. However, because of several scrivener’s errors
on the criminal judgment, we REMAND solely for the purpose of correcting the
judgment to reflect Meza-Sanchez’s conviction and sentence under 46 U.S.C.
§§ 70503(a)(1), 70506(a) & (b), and 21 U.S.C. § 960(b)(1)(B)(ii), not 46 U.S.C.
§§ 708506(a), 70605(b) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 960(b)(1)(B)(ii).
2