Palm, Fechteler & Co. v. Fechteler , 165 A.D. 989 ( 1914 )

Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ., dissented on the ground that it was error to exclude defendant from proving the expenses involved in making the profit which was charged.