Martinez v. Texas Department Corrections , 235 F. App'x 335 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                                               United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    August 16, 2007
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 06-41382
    Summary Calendar
    ROBERT MARTINEZ
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS
    Defendant-Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:04-CV-176
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Robert Martinez, formerly Texas prisoner # 1188230, appeals the district
    court’s dismissal of his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     complaint for lack of prosecution.
    Martinez had raised a number of claims regarding a prison disciplinary hearing
    and various conditions of confinement. The district court dismissed without
    prejudice after Martinez failed to comply with an order to amend his complaint.
    Martinez’s appellate brief fails to adequately address the district court’s
    basis for dismissing his complaint. Although this court liberally construes pro
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 06-41382
    se briefs, see Haines v. Kerner, 
    404 U.S. 519
    , 520 (1972), even pro se litigants
    must brief arguments in order to preserve them. Yohey v. Collins, 
    985 F.2d 222
    ,
    224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Martinez has failed to brief the relevant issue
    for appeal, his appeal is frivolous and is dismissed. See Howard v. King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Martinez’s motion for
    production of documents also is denied.
    Martinez is cautioned that the dismissal of his appeal as frivolous counts
    as a strike under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 
    103 F.3d 383
    ,
    387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). He is also cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes
    under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil
    action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless
    he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
    MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DENIED; APPEAL
    DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-41382

Citation Numbers: 235 F. App'x 335

Judges: Higginbotham, Owen, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 8/16/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023