United States v. Capetillo-Rivera , 203 F. App'x 644 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 25, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 06-40228
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    MARCO ANTONIO CAPETILLO-RIVERA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:05-CR-743-ALL
    --------------------
    Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Marco Antonio Capetillo-Rivera appeals his guilty-plea
    conviction of, and sentence for, violating 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
     by
    being found in the United States without permission after
    deportation.   He argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
     (2000), that the 46-month term of imprisonment imposed
    in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for
    the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment.   He challenges
    the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 06-40228
    -2-
    and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather
    than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.
    Capetillo-Rivera’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by
    Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    , 235 (1998).
    Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly
    decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule
    Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly
    rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres
    remains binding.   See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 
    410 F.3d 268
    ,
    276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    126 S. Ct. 298
     (2005).   Capetillo-
    Rivera properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light
    of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here
    to preserve it for further review.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-40228

Citation Numbers: 203 F. App'x 644

Judges: DeMOSS, Jolly, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 10/25/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023