Tony Tang v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 584 F. App'x 120 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1190
    TONY BERT TANG,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   September 19, 2014               Decided:   October 2, 2014
    Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Oleh R. Tustaniwsky, Brooklyn, New York, for Petitioner. Stuart
    F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux,
    Assistant Director, Robbin K. Blaya, Office of Immigration
    Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
    D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tony Bert Tang, a native and citizen of Indonesia,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals    (“Board”)        dismissing     his   appeal     from   the    immigration
    judge’s decision denying his requests for asylum and withholding
    of removal. *        We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including
    the various documentary exhibits relevant to country conditions
    in Indonesia and the transcript of Tang’s merits hearing.                                We
    conclude      that    the    record   evidence       does   not    compel      a    ruling
    contrary to any of the administrative findings of fact, see 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (b)(4)(B)        (2012),     and   that   substantial        evidence
    supports the Board’s decision.                 See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 481 (1992).               Accordingly, we deny the petition for
    review for the reasons stated by the Board.                        See In re: Tang
    (B.I.A. Feb. 5, 2014).              We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials     before        this   court   and   argument     would      not       aid   the
    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    *
    Tang does not challenge the denial of relief under the
    Convention Against Torture.  Accordingly, review of that issue
    is waived.   Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 
    371 F.3d 182
    , 189 n.7 (4th
    Cir. 2004).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1190

Citation Numbers: 584 F. App'x 120

Filed Date: 10/2/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023