-
13-3218 (L) Cheng v. Holder BIA Burr, IJ A070 701 933 A073 174 512 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United 3 States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, 4 on the 3rd day of November, two thousand fourteen. 5 6 PRESENT: 7 JON O. NEWMAN, 8 DENNIS JACOBS, 9 PIERRE N. LEVAL, 10 Circuit Judges. 11 _____________________________________ 12 13 ZHEN FU CHENG, SHU LING NI, 14 Petitioners, 15 13-3218 (L), 16 v. 13-3237 (Con) 17 NAC 18 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES 19 ATTORNEY GENERAL, 20 Respondent. 21 _____________________________________ 22 23 FOR PETITIONERS: Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York. 24 25 FOR RESPONDENT: Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney 26 General; Katherine E. Clark, Senior 27 Litigation Counsel; Dawn S. Conrad, 08152014-B-3-6 1 Trial Attorney, Office of 2 Immigration Litigation, United 3 States Department of Justice, 4 Washington, D.C. 5 6 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of these petitions for review of 7 two Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decisions, it is 8 hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petitions for 9 review are DENIED. 10 Petitioners Zhen Fu Cheng and Shu Ling Ni, natives and 11 citizens of China, seek review of two August 2013, decisions 12 of the BIA, affirming the February 6, 2012, decision of 13 Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sarah M. Burr, denying their 14 applications for relief under the Convention Against Torture 15 (“CAT”). In re Zhen Fu Cheng, No. A073 174 512 (B.I.A. Aug. 16 16, 2013), and In re Shu Ling Ni, No. 070 701 933 (B.I.A. 17 Aug. 8, 2013), aff’g Nos. A073 174 512, A070 701 933 (Immig. 18 Ct. N.Y. City Feb. 6, 2012). We assume the parties’ 19 familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history 20 of this case. 21 Under the circumstances of this case, we have reviewed 22 the IJ’s decision as modified by the BIA. See Xue Hong Yang 23 v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,
426 F.3d 520, 522 (2d Cir. 2005). 24 The applicable standards of review are well established. 25 08152014-B-3-6 2 1 See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); see also Jian Hui Shao v. 2 Mukasey,
546 F.3d 138, 157-58 (2d Cir. 2008). 3 Petitioners sought relief under the CAT based on their 4 claim that they fear forced sterilization because they have 5 had more than one child in violation of China’s population 6 control program. For largely the same reasons as this Court 7 set forth in Jian Hui Shao,
546 F.3d 138, we find no error 8 in the agency’s determination that petitioners failed to 9 demonstrate their eligibility for CAT relief on this basis. 10 See Jian Hui
Shao, 546 F.3d at 158-72. 11 For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for review are 12 DENIED. As we have completed our review, any stay of 13 removal that the Court previously granted in these petitions 14 is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in 15 these petitions is DISMISSED as moot. Any pending request 16 for oral argument in these petitions is DENIED in accordance 17 with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and 18 Second Circuit Local Rule 34.1(b). 19 FOR THE COURT: 20 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 21 22 23 08152014-B3-6 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 13-3218 (L)
Citation Numbers: 582 F. App'x 37
Filed Date: 11/3/2014
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023