-
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE (#101) Practice Book §10-42 (b) requires that "[a]ny adverse party who objects to [a motion to strike] shall . . . file and serve . . . a memorandum of law." (Emphasis added.) "[T]he filing of a memorandum in opposition to a motion to strike is mandatory and the failure to file such may . . . serve as a ground for granting a motion to strike." Olshefski v. Stenner, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. 351899 (September 27, 1990,2 Conn. L. Rptr. 477 , 478, Clark, J.).The plaintiff failed to file a memorandum in opposition to the instant motion. Accordingly the Motion to Strike (#101) is hereby ordered granted.
ELAINE GORDON, JUDGE
Document Info
Docket Number: No. CV98-86683
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 2960
Judges: GORDON, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 3/8/1999
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021