State v. Burt, Unpublished Decision (8-13-2003) ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • {¶ 13} Although appellant's counsel repeatedly attempted to get the trial judge to respond to the request for his App.R. 9(C) statement, the judge for some unknown reason did not respond as required. Such lack of attention should not be repeated.

    {¶ 14} However, I concur in this opinion.

    (REECE, J., retired judge of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment pursuant to Article IV,§ 6(C), Constitution.)

Document Info

Docket Number: C.A. No. 20960.

Judges: CARR, Presiding Judge.

Filed Date: 8/13/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021