Plante v. Gallant ( 1996 )

USCA1 Opinion

        April 10, 1996          [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 95-2007



                                JOAN PATRICIA PLANTE,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                            JOSEPH GALLANT, COMMISSIONER,

                         DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.





                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                 Selya, Cyr and Lynch,

                                   Circuit Judges.
______________



                                 ____________________





            Joan Patricia Plante on brief pro se.
____________________

            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney   General,  and  Rosemary  S.  Gale,
__________________                             __________________

        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.





                                 ____________________





                                 ____________________

































                      Per  Curiam.    We  affirm   the  district  court's
___________



            judgment  dismissing appellant's action,  essentially for the



            reasons  given  in  the  court's decision  dated  August  22,



            1995.1  See  also Seminole  Tribe of Florida  v. Florida,  64
1  ___  ____ __________________________     _______



            U.S.L.W. 4167 (U.S. Mar. 27, 1996) (holding that Congress may



            not  abrogate  the  states' Eleventh  Amendment  immunity  in



            exercising its power under the Commerce Clause).



                      Affirmed.
_________
































































____________________



               1The dismissal of this action, of course, operates without
1

            prejudice to the appellant's pursuit of whatever remedies (if

            any) she may have in the Massachusetts courts.



                                         -2-