Whitehead v. Strayer University , 332 F. App'x 27 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:

    David Whitehead appeals the district court’s August 29, 2008, September 8, 2008 and September 11, 2008 orders. We have *28 reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Whitehead’s motion for appointment of counsel; deny Whitehead’s en banc requesi/motion to seize all products based on Whitehead’s intellectual properties; deny Whitehead’s motion for injunction relief to move Wall Street to Richmond, Virginia; deny Whitehead’s July 2, 2009 motion to consolidate his eight pending appeals and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitehead v. Strayer Univ. No. 1:08-cv00832-MB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 29, 2008 & entered Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 8, 2009 & entered Sept. 9, 2008; filed & entered Sept. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-2060, 09-1154

Citation Numbers: 332 F. App'x 27

Judges: Gregory, King, Michael, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 9/2/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023