Lomax v. State , 907 S.W.2d 333 ( 1995 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We affirm dismissal of defendant-movant Lomax’s Rule 29.15 motion because it was filed out of time, Malone v. State, 798 S.W.2d 149, 151 (Mo. banc 1990) cert. denied 500 U.S. 929, 111 S.Ct. 2044, 114 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991), and was addressed to deficiencies of appellate counsel, matters not within the rule. Reuscher v. State, 887 S.W.2d 588, 591 (Mo. banc 1994).

We affirm.