Scott v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Clements Unit Amarillo Texas , 70 F. App'x 235 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                          United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS           July 28, 2003
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT             Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-10189
    Summary Calendar
    MICHAEL WAYNE SCOTT,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Clements Unit
    Amarillo Texas; JOSEPH K. PRICE, Warden Clements Unit;
    HERMAN WESTON, JR., Assistant Warden Clements Unit;
    FRANK D. POHLMEIER, Major Clements Unit,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 2:02-CV-281
    --------------------
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Michael Wayne Scott, Texas prisoner # 683064, seeks to
    appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the dismissal of his civil rights
    complaint under the “three strikes” provision of 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g).     Scott does not challenge the district court’s
    determination that, on at least three prior occasions while
    incarcerated, he has brought an action or appeal in a United
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 03-10189
    -2-
    States court that has been dismissed as frivolous and/or for
    failure to state a claim.   Instead, he argues that he falls
    within the “imminent danger” exception of 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g).
    A review of the record and Scott’s appellate brief reveals
    that he has failed to establish that he was “under imminent
    danger of serious physical injury” at the time that he filed his
    notice of appeal IFP.   See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g); Baños v. O’Guin,
    
    144 F.3d 883
    , 885 (5th Cir. 1998).    Accordingly, his IFP status
    is decertified, all outstanding motions are denied, and his
    appeal is dismissed.    See 
    id.
       Should Scott wish to reinstate his
    appeal, he has 30 days from the date of this opinion to pay the
    full appellate filing fee to the clerk of the district court.
    See 
    id.
    IFP DECERTIFIED.   ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.   APPEAL
    DISMISSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-10189

Citation Numbers: 70 F. App'x 235

Judges: Davis, Higginbotham, Per Curiam, Prado

Filed Date: 7/28/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2023