In re Hammitt , 108 F. App'x 802 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM:

    Randy Lee Hammitt and Beau Horner petition for a writ of mandamus. They seek an order compelling the district court and the bankruptcy court to stop the proceedings against them.

    Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979).

    The relief sought by Hammitt and Horner is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 04-1513

Citation Numbers: 108 F. App'x 802

Judges: Niemeyer, Widener, Williams

Filed Date: 9/13/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023