United States v. McNack , 146 F. App'x 957 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                                         F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    August 30, 2005
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee.                        No. 04-5012
    v.                                               (D.C. No. 03-CR-102-C)
    LEWIS ELSWORTH McNACK,                                 (N.D. Okla.)
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before EBEL, McKAY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.
    After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has
    determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
    determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
    The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
    Defendant pled guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 2113
    (a). The district court sentenced him to one hundred seventy-eight
    (178) months of incarceration followed by a three (3) year term of supervised
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
    doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
    generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
    and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    release. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal of the “judgment and sentence
    filed of record [sic] in this case on January 13, 2004.” Rec., Vol. 1, Tab. 34 at 1.
    Thereafter Defendant’s counsel filed a brief following the mandate of Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), accompanied by a request to withdraw as
    counsel.
    According to counsel, there are no arguable appealable issues. Aplt.
    Anders Br. at 5. We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that
    counsel is correct that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised; nothing
    indicates that the plea agreement was not entered into knowingly and voluntarily
    or that the sentence was calculated incorrectly. Counsel’s brief contains a
    certificate of service certifying that Defendant was furnished with a copy of
    counsel’s brief on May 17, 2004. Id. at 7. Defendant has not filed a brief
    indicating disagreement with his counsel’s position. We therefore GRANT
    counsel leave to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s decision.
    AFFIRMED.
    Entered for the Court
    Monroe G. McKay
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-5012

Citation Numbers: 146 F. App'x 957

Judges: McKAY

Filed Date: 8/30/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023