Tarsadeus Tarceyla Fisher v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )

In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-22-00127-CR
TARSADEUS TARCEYLA FISHER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 6th District Court
Lamar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 29423
Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Tarsadeus Tarceyla Fisher pled guilty to the offense of deadly conduct1 and was placed
on five years’ deferred adjudication community supervision. On September 16, 2022, the trial
court revoked Fisher’s deferred adjudication community supervision, adjudicated her guilty, and
sentenced her to four years’ confinement. On the day of her sentencing, Fisher waived her right
of appeal when she signed a document titled Waiver of Rights to Appeal Community
Supervision Revocation. That document states,
I, TARSADEUS TARCEYLA FISHER, Defendant in the above-entitled and
numbered cause, having been convicted of the offense of DEADLY CONDUCT
DISCHARGE FIREARM and sentenced therein, hereby expressly state as a fact
that I have been fully informed by the Judge of this Court and by my attorney, and
I know, that I have the legal right of appeal from this conviction to the Court and
by my attorney, and I know, that I have the legal right of appeal from this
conviction to the Court of Appeals of Texas, and also the right to be represented
on appeal by an attorney of my own choice, or if I am too poor to pay for such an
attorney or the record on appeal, the Court will, without expense to me, provide
me with such an attorney and a proper record for such an appeal.
With full understanding of the above, I hereby in open court state that I do not
desire to appeal and expressly waive any appeal in this case, and I hereby accept
as final the judgment of conviction and sentence herein and I request that I be
allowed to commence serving the same without further delay, and I also in open
court expressly waive the filing of a Motion for New Trial as well as any Motion
in Arrest of Judgment.
The waiver of right to appeal was also signed by Fisher’s attorney and by the district clerk of
Lamar County.
Even though Fisher waived her right of appeal, she nevertheless, acting pro se, filed a
notice of appeal. “A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over and must dismiss an appeal when
1
TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.05(b).
2
the defendant has validly waived [her] right of appeal.” Lopez v. State, 595 S.W.3d 897, 899
(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, pet. ref’d) (citing Jones v. State, 488 S.W.3d 801, 808
(Tex. Crim. App. 2016)); see also Freeman v. State, 913 S.W.2d 714 (Tex. App.—Amarillo
1995, pet. ref’d).
On October 14, 2022, we informed Fisher of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over
this appeal and afforded her an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. Fisher
did not file a response to our jurisdictional defect letter.
Because Fisher has no right of appeal as a result of her explicit, written waiver of that
right, and because the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that she is without a right of
appeal, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: November 17, 2022
Date Decided: November 18, 2022
Do Not Publish
3