United States v. Sanchez , 254 F. App'x 205 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-6772
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DANIEL SANCHEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.     Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (2:03-CR-184-RGD-FBS; 2:07-cv-131)
    Submitted:   October 26, 2007          Decided:     November 16, 2007
    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Daniel Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel Sanchez seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2000) motion.             The order is
    not   appealable    unless   a   circuit    justice   or    judge   issues     a
    certificate of appealability.          
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).          A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                   
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).     A   prisoner   satisfies      this   standard    by
    demonstrating      that   reasonable     jurists   would     find   that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.          Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).            We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sanchez has not
    made the requisite showing.       Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant Sanchez’s motion to
    seal medical record exhibits and deny his motion to expand the
    certificate of appealability.           We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-6772

Citation Numbers: 254 F. App'x 205

Judges: Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler, Wilkinson

Filed Date: 11/16/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023