Basnight v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n , 238 F. App'x 982 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-1380
    FRANKLIN BASNIGHT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HAMPTON    ROADS     SHIPPING    ASSOCIATION,
    International    Longshoremen’s   Association
    Fringe Benefit Escrow Fund’s (HRSA-ILA Fund);
    MANAGEMENT; JOHN CALVERT BOWERS, President,
    International Longshoremen’s Association,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
    Judge. (2:04-cv-00782-WDK)
    Submitted:    August 3, 2007                 Decided:   August 30, 2007
    Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Franklin Basnight, Appellant Pro Se.         Dean Taylor Buckius,
    VANDEVENTER & BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; David Andrew Buzard,
    GLASSER & GLASSER, Norfolk, Virginia; John P. Sheridan, GLEASON,
    MARRINAN & MAZOLA MARDON, PC, New York, New York; Carroll Arthur
    Rutter, Jr., RUTTER & MILLS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Franklin Basnight appeals the district court’s order
    adopting in part and modifying in part the magistrate judge’s
    report and recommendation to dismiss his hybrid action under the
    Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 
    29 U.S.C. § 185
     (2000), and
    the National Labor Relations Act, 
    29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169
     (2000), and
    dismissing all pending motions as moot.       We have reviewed the
    record and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm for
    the reasons stated by the district court.   See Basnight v. Hampton
    Roads Shipping Ass’n, No. 2:04-cv-00782-WDK (E.D. Va. filed March
    21, 2007; entered March 22, 2007).    We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-1380

Citation Numbers: 238 F. App'x 982

Judges: Duncan, Hamilton, Per Curiam, Shedd

Filed Date: 8/30/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023