Jenkins v. Whiteman ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    Filed 6/3/96
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    ANTHONY RAY JENKINS,                            )
    )
    Plaintiff-Appellant,             )
    )
    v.                                        )                   No. 95-3011
    )              (D.C. No. 94-3502-DES)
    DONNA WHITEMAN, Secretary of Kansas             )                    (D. Kansas)
    Social and Rehabilitation Services; T. KETH     )
    WILSON; DONNA C. STUART, SRS;                   )
    JILL BURTZLOFF, SRS,                            )
    )
    Defendants-Appellees.            )
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
    Before ANDERSON, BARRETT and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.
    This matter is before the court on plaintiff Anthony Ray Jenkins’ motion for leave
    to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal without payment of costs or fees.
    To succeed on his motion plaintiff must show both the financial inability to pay the
    required filing fees and the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
    law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
    citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
    the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (d); Coppedge v.
    United States, 
    369 U.S. 438
     (1962); Ragan v. Cox, 
    305 F.2d 58
     (10th Cir. 1962).
    Plaintiff seeks to appeal the dismissal of his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     complaint against
    the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, two SRS
    employees and the Seward County (Kansas) judge. He contends they should be arrested
    for extortion. He also seeks relief from a journal entry against his wife that supports a
    wage garnishment proceeding. He asserts general allegations of denial of due process
    and Fourth Amendment guarantees, and failure to grant him a speedy trial. The requested
    remedies are not available under § 1983.
    We conclude that plaintiff can make no rational argument on the law or facts in
    support of the issues raised on appeal. Therefore, the motion for leave to proceed on
    appeal without prepayment of costs or fees is denied. The appeal is DISMISSED.
    The mandate shall issue forthwith.
    Entered for the Court
    James K. Logan
    Circuit Judge
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-3011

Filed Date: 6/3/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021