Paine (Frederick) v. State ( 2014 )

 demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1);
NRS 34.810(3).
Appellant did not attempt to demonstrate good cause. 3 We
therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying his
petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
Hardesty
Douglas
J.
3 Thefiling of amended judgments of conviction on December 7, 1992,
January 12, 1993, and July 26, 1995, and a second amended judgment of
conviction on June 20, 2012, failed to demonstrate good cause to overcome
the procedural bars because the petition was filed more than one year
after each of them, and appellant failed to explain the delay. See Sullivan
v. State, 120 Nev. 537, 541, 96 P.3d 761, 764 (2004); Hathaway v. State,
119 Nev. 248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). The filing of the third
amended judgment of conviction on July 5, 2012, also failed to
demonstrate good cause because it merely corrected a clerical error in the
credit for time served and thus had no effect on the running of the
limitations period for filing a timely post-conviction petition for a writ of
habeas corpus. See Sullivan, 120 Nev. at 541-42, 96 P.3d at 764-65.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A 0
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge
Frederick Lavelle Paine
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A