United States v. Brewster , 541 F. App'x 897 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                              FILED
    United States Court of Appeals
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS       Tenth Circuit
    FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                     November 18, 2013
    Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    Clerk of Court
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.                                                        No. 13-1418
    (D.C. No. 1:13-CR-00081-RBJ-1)
    ROBERT ARTHUR BREWSTER,                                    (D. Colo.)
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
    Before LUCERO, HOLMES, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.
    After entering into a plea agreement that included a waiver of his right to
    appeal, Robert Arthur Brewster pleaded guilty to one count of producing child
    pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). He was sentenced to 235 months of
    imprisonment, lifetime supervised release, and $3,000 in restitution, and he forfeited
    certain computer equipment. Notwithstanding the waiver, Mr. Brewster appealed.
    *
    This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the
    determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The
    case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment
    is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
    and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent
    with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
    The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under United States v.
    Hahn, 
    359 F.3d 1315
    , 1325, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). In
    response, through counsel, Mr. Brewster has conceded that the appeal waiver is
    enforceable. And although we need not address a Hahn factor that the defendant
    does not contest, see United States v. Porter, 
    405 F.3d 1136
    , 1143 (10th Cir. 2005),
    our independent review confirms that all of the Hahn factors are satisfied.
    The motion to enforce is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
    Entered for the Court
    Per Curiam
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1418

Citation Numbers: 541 F. App'x 897

Judges: Bacharach, Holmes, Lucero, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 11/18/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023