United States v. Nichols ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                     FILED
    United States Court of Appeals
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                            Tenth Circuit
    FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                              April 23, 2019
    _________________________________
    Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    Clerk of Court
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    No. 18-3179
    v.                                                (D.C. Nos. 2:16-CV-02381-KHV &
    2:03-CR-20149-KHV-DJW-1)
    SAMMY NICHOLS,                                                 (D. Kan.)
    Defendant - Appellant.
    _________________________________
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
    _________________________________
    Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
    _________________________________
    This matter is before us on the “Motion of the United States for Summary
    Affirmance” (“Motion”). The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district
    court’s judgment based on this court’s recent published decision in United States v.
    Pullen, 
    913 F.3d 1270
     (10th Cir. 2019), en banc rev. denied April 15, 2019. Defendant-
    Appellant does not dispute that United States v. Greer, 
    881 F.3d 1241
     (10th Cir. 2018)
    and Pullen control the outcome of this appeal; Mr. Nichols does not contest summary
    *
    After examining the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that
    oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See
    Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted
    without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under
    the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
    however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R.
    32.1.
    affirmance of the district court’s judgment, but he reserves the right to appeal this matter
    to the United States Supreme Court for further review.
    In light of the foregoing, the abatement of this matter is LIFTED, and the Motion
    is GRANTED. In light of this court’s decision in Pullen, the judgment of the district court
    is AFFIRMED.
    Entered for the Court
    Per Curiam
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-3179

Filed Date: 4/23/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/23/2019