Motley v. State , 793 S.W.2d 409 ( 1990 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary *410hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 56967

Citation Numbers: 793 S.W.2d 409

Filed Date: 5/22/1990

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/1/2021