Darks v. Ward ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                                                                         F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    JUN 24 1997
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    TYRONE PETER DARKS,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    No. 96-6086
    (D.C. No. CIV-96-268-T)
    RON WARD, Warden, Oklahoma
    (W.D. Okla.)
    State Penitentiary; and DREW
    EDMONDSON, Attorney General of
    the State of Oklahoma,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before BRORBY, EBEL and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
    Petitioner-Appellant Tyrone Peter Darks was convicted of first degree
    murder on November 20, 1995 in Cleveland County, Oklahoma, District Court.
    *
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral
    argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is
    therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is
    not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
    and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and
    judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and
    conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    Darks was subsequently sentenced to death by lethal injection. Three months
    after his conviction, on February 21, 1996, Darks filed a petition for a writ of
    habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Oklahoma. In the petition, Darks raised various constitutional and evidentiary
    objections to the state court conviction. However, because Darks’ state court
    direct appeal was still pending, the district court dismissed the petition without
    prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. Darks filed a notice of appeal on
    March 6, 1996, and filed an application for a certificate of probable cause on
    March 26, 1996. Under the amended version of 28 U.S.C. § 2254, we treat
    Darks’ application for a certificate of probable cause as a motion for a certificate
    of appealability. Lennox v. Evans, 
    87 F.3d 431
    , 434 (10th Cir. 1996), cert.
    denied, 
    117 S. Ct. 746
    .
    The district court correctly concluded that Darks failed to exhaust state
    remedies before pursuing this habeas action, and that it thus lacked jurisdiction to
    consider the merits of Darks’ petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). In his petition,
    Darks concedes that his appeal to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals was
    filed on December 29, 1995. That court had not reached a decision on Darks’
    appeal by the time his petition was filed, and we take judicial notice that it still
    has not done so. Thus, the district court properly dismissed Darks’ petition sua
    sponte. Odum v. Boone, 
    62 F.3d 327
    , 332-33 n.2 (10th Cir. 1995).
    -2-
    Accordingly, Darks’ motion for a certificate of appealability is DENIED
    and his appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    David M. Ebel
    Circuit Judge
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-6086

Filed Date: 6/24/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021